Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Starr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus following relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Starr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources to verify his notability. Likely to be a very old self-promotional page (written by a long-gone single purpose editor) with little to no improvement over the past 8 years The-Pope (talk) 00:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 00:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 00:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 00:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete can't find any sources on Starr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk • contribs) 08:44, 21 April 2016‎

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not sufficient independent complete coverage. not notable. VanEman (talk) 06:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ben Starr the American producer seems a lot more relevant and should instead be given this URL link to search for, in my humble opinion. Conspirasee1 (talk) 15:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable radio personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.